No. The reason Hillary would not accept the vote was because she thought she should have won due to her side creating fraud voting.Voting machines somehow seemed to have worked well enough when Trump won, and would not have been questioned if Trump won this time. What a bunch of transparent nonsense.
Funny the Dominion execs pulled a no show in PA. If it was so transparent.....
Specifically the Dominion Voting System was called out in tweets as changing "millions" of votes. The Dominion Voting System is used in the State of Georgia. Georgia recently released the results of a hand count. There were 2000 odd votes that were found to have not been counted. Those votes were reportedly contained on a memory stick that was misplaced by an inept government employee. (Inept government employee? Ever spend any time in the DMV?)
Anyway, the recount didn't show any significant differences over the Dominion Voting System tabulations. Draw whatever conclusions you want from that information.
It seems it is a hack right off of the assembly line, closed source OS.Cute.
Although he gleaned quite a bunch of interesting info from the machine, he didn't really *hack* it.
No false data was entered, no breaching of the protection protocols.
Yes, he was able to physically remove the PROM that contained the programming, but he didn't do anything with it
(and it may not have revealed any useful SSL key info, either, since that's a one-way protocol.)
Since there are additional layers of security (he speaks of a manual key entry), that means that even knowing the machine's key would still leave you trying to guess the secondary key.
I've hacked less-secure systems (as in: modified the firmware to add features and bypass bugs), and the stuff he's showing (even with a "dump the PROM" readout) he's still man-months away from any significant penetration. Certainly a building full of Chinese hackers would have it singing and dancing within a week, but your casual hacker would take a good while.
I may have missed it, did he ever say whose machine it was? (i.e. make and model, not that it was from Meyers Lake Ohio)
Paper ballots but done in person is the most secure. Absentee next but with verification. Mail in not so much. I don’t think UN monitors would go along with mail in ballots or stopping the count on Election Day.Paper is the most secure, a logger cuts the tree down, the mill turns it into paper, a printer prints the ballots and sealed envelopes. Then on election day they are opened with all parties present to observie post marks on the sealed envelope, and to verify signatures. That is what I would considered less vulnerable. You take these ITs with an agenda, and what could go wrong?
Just for amusement: have you ever used the old mechanical tabulating machines? Dozens of little flip-toggles (plus a couple of big handles that flipped them "all" if you wanted to vote straight party-lines. The final "Vote" lever then re-opened the curtain behind you. No paper audit trail that the voter had access to. There were always precincts/areas/cities/states that had "rigged" machines for shifting or undercounting votes. The world and time conspired that i got to use one once.
That's not how the Supreme Court works. They don't rule on a case (per se'), they rule on the matter of the law that the lower court judge may have mis-applied (or other words to that effect).I would tend to believe that the Trump legal camp is holding out proof for the Supreme Court review and not showing their cards beforehand..So that the other team can't prepare for whats coming.
Our state has done it for years. The signature (on the outside of the envelope) is compared to your registration card (on a screen). IF it doesn't match, they try to contact you by phone. email, or (perhaps) letter mail to your address. Next to the signature on the envelope is a spot for you to provide your preferred contact method (failing which, they'll use mail).What I do think skewed the tally was mail in voting with no real way to confirm signatures at this point.
If you didn't receive your requested ballot in time for the election, there is a "federal only" ballot you can download, fill in and submit. That would cause such a "president only" ballot.My understanding is that there are hundreds of thousands of votes in battleground states with only Biden filled in. No other votes for any other race that were on the same card. Also thousands of straight republican with only Biden chosen for POTUS. ..this is also irregular.
The Supreme court doesn't "investigate" ... they're not trying to "try a criminal case", they're only listening and ruling on how the lower court handled the case, not the guilt of the criminal.Low level courts are clearly going to punt on these cases and the Trump administration knows that. They don't want the vehicle that brings the BLM parade to town to set it on fire. ..When this does ...and it will..end up in the S.C...Its going to be a real test of the metal in that court. On one hand, if they punt...It will erode the faith in our voting system of 70mil plus Americans. If they decide to dig deep and investigate...The left will scream bloody murder and torch every city and town they can
??? (and i assume you meant "anecdotal")Your replies are antidotal of the issues that are present in the last voting cycle...You are a bit late
In the US, the theory is that the accuser (plaintiff) presents their best case *at the beginning*.I would tend to believe that the Trump legal camp is holding out proof for the Supreme Court review and not showing their cards beforehand.