lindenengineering
Well-known member
Take note
One of my frequent refrains working at the "pointed" end
Dennis
One of my frequent refrains working at the "pointed" end
Dennis
The issue is parts and planned obsolescence.I have said it once, and I will say it many times again, older is better. If I had time to do the work on it, I'd be driving a TN, not a Sprinter. There is nothing better than a fully mechanical OM615/616/617.
Eh, its just money, Dennis. If I can keep 100 year old stoves going, I'm sure it is possible to keep a van powered by an engine that is still basically in production (Force Motors, India, and Iran Khodro, Iran) running. Its a very simple box compared to even a T1N.The issue is parts and planned obsolescence.
Even T1N Sprinters are now devoid of vital parts to keep this stuff running.
There is only so much you can make in the back garden shed you know!
Dennis
Actually these faults mentioned are often seen and experiences by us who are commissioned to fix this stuff------MB products are fraught with issues highlighted----- AND then we have keyboard experts who try to tell us professionals how we are doing it all wrong.That "documentary" is obvious AI slop. The sentiment is rooted in reality but so many dumb hyperbolic AI statements.
Interesting that so many complain about complexity (and the reduced reliability that follows) of features, while insisting on an ethic of always more more more(!), including those features.
So many here are well versed in scientific principles like basic physics and the laws of thermal dynamics and accept them as TRUTH. Yet, have privileged blind spots that don't allow them to see similar principles in economics, ecology and the human policies that (poorly) attempt to manage them.
OKEh, its just money, Dennis. If I can keep 100 year old stoves going, I'm sure it is possible to keep a van powered by an engine that is still basically in production (Force Motors, India, and Iran Khodro, Iran) running. Its a very simple box compared to even a T1N.
Limited production numbers? Over the past 50 years they have built millions of OM615/616/617 engines, and hundreds of thousands of TN vans were built, if not more. In fact, Force still markets an updated version of the TN for which many of the body parts and such still fit the old chassis. Besides, this stuff is simple as heck.OK
Ask them if they will build you a new engine or chassis harness?.------Something we do in house--'Cos nobody will go near it for the LIMITED production number involved.
Dennis
Don't get me wrong, I don't disagree, my issue with AI slop aside. Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.Actually these faults mentioned are often seen and experiences by us who are commissioned to fix this stuff------MB products are fraught with issues highlighted----- AND then we have keyboard experts who try to tell us professionals how we are doing it all wrong.
These days "I read it on the forums seems to be the repair auricle!
Denis
I'd start over with a GM or Ford with a normally aspired V8 if I ever do. @Midwestdrifter has the right idea IMO.Which is why I’m considering a Transit AWD if I buy another van.
BejezusDon't get me wrong, I don't disagree, my issue with AI slop aside. Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
We are part of the system that produces this stuff, that's all.
Any experience with the W12 Phaeton? That car alone proves this AI slop's point.
What is Ford doing differently. There are probably 1-3 dozen control modules on a Transit. Who makes these modules it’s not Ford or Benz I’m guessing. I looked hard at the Transit. I was laughed off by the salesman when I asked about an order in mid 2023. Might have been early 2024.AI (which I despise) or not, there’s a few bs statements but more truth in this video.
Some on this forum have experienced numerous glitches, and friends of mine bought a new MB SUV and had nothing but problems, they are now “never again” regarding MB… which was their dream car before.
Which is why I’m considering a Transit AWD if I buy another van.
Problematic systems and design flaws are the main issue.What is Ford doing differently. There are probably 1-3 dozen control modules on a Transit. Who makes these modules it’s not Ford or Benz I’m guessing. I looked hard at the Transit. I was laughed off by the salesman when I asked about an order in mid 2023. Might have been early 2024.
take your pic. I think volume will be the biggest asset in getting problems fixed. If you’ve never seen that issue before it may take a long time to solve. I don’t see any flaws in MB approach that says they will be less prone to failures. To me the issue training technicians well. Who has better techs Ford or MB commercial dealers?
How good is the third party support? Any local mechanic probably has quite a bit of experience with a ford V6 NA and turbo and the 10 speed. Any transit oriented shop had experience with MB systems.
these electrical gremlins are edge cases. See video below. You better have techs trained on using multi channel oscilloscopes.