Thanks, Carl.Notice how the cable from the battery is laid over the P/S rack (gear) and then criss/crossed over the cable that goes to the alternator. The added stress on the cable joint (splice) connector , and the engine heat , cause the shrink tubing to get bridle and then split (because of stress). This allows moisture to enter the cable joint and wire itself, then you get a failure (prematurely).
When you install the new cable run the cable that goes to the battery - behind the one that goes to the alternator, then using the new bracket that comes on the new cable (you may have to cut the cable tie to reposition) secure the cable to the engine , were the bracket to the alternator cable is bolted to the block by the bell housing, then run back to the frame rail to the battery (the way it was before). Do not cross over the P/S rack (gear)
Carl
I would need to see the schematic to be 100% certain, but with that caveat there are only two things it can possibly do: to protect the alternator from a) a short to ground at the battery or jumper post (I would think the alternator should have its own internal protection circuitry... or, perhaps not) b) an over-voltage (24V) jump start. Either one of these I think has a negligible chance of happening for almost anyone reading this forum. Certainly for anyone that has the wherewithal to replace the cable on their own.Before I replaced the battery cable, I recorded:
I'm going to ask again: What does that in line fuse do?
Absolutely no reason I can think of. If my Sprinter develops this problem that is what I intend to do. That said, fusible links are a standard component in vehicle electrical system design. They aren't infallible though, and can fail when they shouldn't.Here's another question:
Why can't we just put a straight, well-sealed, non-fused, stranded-copper cable from the alternator to the starter and put another non-fused, stranded-copper cable continuing on towards the starter battery?
I think a crimp in the middle of the cable would be tough to properly accomplish mechanically. I don't know if they even make connectors that are made to crimp mid-cable. Seems like it would have a tendency to come loose, assuming you even could get it to fit up against the starter post, which I doubt you could.Alternatively, why can't there just be one cable with a crimped on lug to attach to the starter as the cable makes it way from the alternator to the battery?
-Jon
What I'm not sure about is whether the rest of the vehicle electrical system is connected at the battery end of the Y cable or the alternator end. It could make a difference as far as what is being protected, or not, against over-voltages or ground-shorts. I don't think it would change my opinion about leaving the fuse out of a replacement cable, but it would clarify the failure mode and what I'm risking.I think it's a 300amp fused link in the cable. I know for a fact that MB sells it seperately. I also know for a fact it sits between the alternator and the starter.
I agree that it might be tough to get a mechanically sound connection with three terminals between the battery, the starter and the alternator. The post would likely accomodate thicker lugs than stock.
Mostly I'm ticked because it's a sucky weak design with no excuse that anyone I've spoken with is able justify.
-Jon
You're welcome for the metrics.Jon, changing the cable overall went smooth? I bet you have saved the old cable, thanks for the detailed before and after volts.
http://www.phillipsind.com/flashmag/WebCatalog/WebCatalogMag1/Jon,
I used welding cable, lugs, and the linked to crimper from Wind & Sun.
http://www.solar-electric.com/teluwiha.html
I'm still looking for a ring connector with a 90 degree bend for the connection at the alternator.
eb