Solution: SuSi (super single) spare wheel storage

mean_in_green

>2,000,000m in MB vans
Here's something which I've been mulling over for the last six months: how do you carry a spare if you have a SuSi rear axle, as the front and rear wheels are different sizes?

First things first: you don't get ANY spare wheels if you buy a SuSi variant! I don't know why either - ask DC. It's rubbish. Not only that, but you don't get the two retaining bolts for the spare wheel carrier or the hinge brackets welded to the chassis rails either. You do get the holes for the bolts though...

I decided the best practice for me would be to carry two spares. If it initially seems "too prepared" consider that this is still one less wheel overall than a dually and I have the potential to resolve two puncture events on one journey - surely the sensible approach?

The next problem was where to put the spare wheels? I knew one thing - I didn't want to spend the next ten years regularly moving them around inside the back of the van. No, that's a non-starter. Sod's Law dictates that the spares will be buried underneath other immoveable stuff when required... What to do?

With some careful measuring I thought it possible that I could fit both my spares under the van behind the rear axle (extended body remember). I mocked up a 2D ladder frame out of 30mm box just to try the theory out by placing the frame and both spares on a jack and trying them for size - it looked like it would work so I made the frame into a 3D form to accommodate the differences in tyre width and the way the smaller wheel tilts up into the body behind the bumper. I then emulated the factory hinge arrangement using genuine DC carrier brackets clamping over some M12 bar all bolted to my own design "hanger" which slots in between two chassis rails above the rear axle.

I bought a couple of the standard spare wheel carrier retaining bolts and the hook ends that fit to them. I designed my rack to have two M12 bolts that the hooks latch on to in the same way the standard rack is held. After another mocking up session I was happy that both wheels were firmly gripped and held in place when the standard bolts were tightened up.

Cue an industrial dose of seam sealer / three coats of epoxy two pack mastic sealer / some internal chassis wax treatment and here's the finished result (the SuSi wheel is nearest the axle):







As you can see the edge of the SuSi wheel is just visible in the side profile view, the smaller wheel is completely out of sight just as the standard carrier arrangement.

The pros are that I have an entirely clear loadspace and a more theft resistant solution than standard wheel carrier because of the heavy duty nature of the rack.

The cons are that I have altered the weight distribution in a theoretically undesirable way, however this is something I'm prepared to accept and in context (capable four series weight variant & lowest possible placement of the weight) I can live with it. Also the loaded weight of the rack is considerable, but I am easily able to use either the jack or a shoring bar I carry to provide the necessary help.

Its first road test was a drive to Lisbon and back from the UK - wheels absolutely rock solid in position upon return. Actually I didn't just drive 4,000 miles solely to test it out, but it was a good opportunity to see how it performed... Of course easily adaptable - you could carry two "conventional" spares couldn't you, if venturing off the beaten track?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

georgetg

2005 140" low roof
Simon, that is absolutely brilliant!

First rate execution also...

The can of tire sealant DC gives you in lieu of a spare is rather silly...

Cheers
George
 

Chandlerazman

Active member
What an awesome solution! Excellent job. I'm impressed with the quality. Surely looks like factory :clapping: My wife and I were in Lisbon about two summers ago. What a great trip that was. We started off in Faro (flew in from Phoenix, AZ) stayed with friends and drove up the whole country. We did manage to drive into Seville Spain, however those people were just snots. Pretty country though. My wife and I decided our retirement will be outside of the U.S. There is nothing like being able to drive through all of Europe.
Enjoy your van, she is a gorgeous one :thumbup: (save your plans on the carrier...If they get the SuSi's here, I may need a set!)
 

mean_in_green

>2,000,000m in MB vans
Cheers both. No plans exist - I made it up as I went along, but I'll shim under with a measure should anyone be interested. I love Iberia too - some of Europe's most magnificent driving roads are to be found there and the Portuguese are amongst the most welcoming anywhere. You probably found the climate a little fresh coming from Arizona? Not so to a pasty Brit - the aircon in an NCV3 cools better than a T1Ncan!
 

shanemac

Active member
Yes nice job :bow:... i could see other rig owners asking to buy your tire rack....heck sell them blue prints:smirk:
 

mean_in_green

>2,000,000m in MB vans
Edit after just reading this again:

My idea to shrink wrap the wheels to keep them clean didn't last long - the wrap was too lightweight, but a couple of heavy duty vinyl wheel covers have worked better since.

I also later fitted a couple of "stops" to the frame rails, just some offcuts of an ally "L" profile bolted using existing holes. They keep the largest wheel perfectly / centrally in place (I had found that it could wander a little over time).

It all still works fine, although I recently reworked part of it. I originally made it all in box section then sprayed the internal cavities with wax and capped the openings. This didn't stop corrosion setting in on the lower most part of the frame, but hey Version 1.0 lasted twelve years - that's good enough. For the refurbishment I used 3mm angle instead, taking the profile into consideration so as not to create water traps. No photos but in retrospect I think that was a better approach if I was to make another.
 
Powdercoating would seal all the metal, inside and out, of your great functional design.

Those extended vans are quite extended under there.

A couple of inches of body lift could be helpful too. One can't have enough ground clearance when you need it.

Good solution there mean in green. The mothers of invention are alive and well.
 

mean_in_green

>2,000,000m in MB vans
Since those photos were taken back in 2010 I’ve replaced the rear springs with 5.0t ones (my originals were 4.6t). A small theoretical increase in capacity, but the main improvement was +/-50mm height increase. The ride height front / rear is perfect.

The extended body variants do have a noticeable overhang behind the rear axle. As always it’s a balance of compromises…

With the extended frame it is not hard to inadvertently overload the weight behind the rear axle beyond what you might prefer, rather than having it between the axles where it’s safer. I will often use empty pallets just to push another heavy one in enough over the rear axle to be good on both axle weights. It means having to use a bar to drag them out again, but it’s better to do that than sit a heavy load right on the tail (tempting for the lazy).

Towing capacity is also affected with an extended body, the tow bar even touches down in certain situations. Forget parking in any UK sized parking space (but two end-to-end are fine), plus the extra body weight has an effect on fuel economy.

On the plus side: space / capacity. A factory option that just you can’t otherwise easily resolve on only two axles.
 
Last edited:

Top Bottom