What's quicker&faster 1/4 mile-a 4cyl/auto/FWD 4-door Accord or a dual-quad 426 Hemi?

What's quicker&faster 1/4 mile-a 4cyl/auto/FWD 4-door Accord or a dual-quad 426 Hemi?

There wasn't enough room to put all the info in the thread title, so here goes:

What do YOU think is quicker and faster in the standing quarter-mile, a stock 2018 Honda Accord 4-cylinder 2.0T/auto front wheel drive 4-door sedan, or a stock 1966 Dodge Coronet 2-door, powered by the mythical "425-horsepower" version of the 426 Hemi, as equipped with it's standard dual 4-barrel carburetors, cast-iron 4-into-1 headers, and big solid-lifter cam?

I picked a really close one this time, so don't be afraid to guess wrong...

Re: What's quicker&faster 1/4 mile-a 4cyl/auto/FWD 4-door Accord or a dual-quad 426 H

57 views over two days, and nobody knows the answer?

Motor Trend tested the 2018 Honda Accord 4-cylinder 2.0T/auto front wheel drive 4-door sedan- it ran a 14.10 at 102.00 mph.

Car Craft tested the 1966 Dodge Coronet 2-door "425-horsepower" 8-barrel 426 Hemi back when it was new- it ran a 14.11 at 98.68mph.

That was a close one...

Re: What's quicker&faster 1/4 mile-a 4cyl/auto/FWD 4-door Accord or a dual-quad 426 H

Which one would rather have: not even close.

Re: What's quicker&faster 1/4 mile-a 4cyl/auto/FWD 4-door Accord or a dual-quad 426 H

CJPJ said:

Which one would rather have: not even close.

Click to expand...

I would have no use for either one of those turds.