thx for the thoughts Bob
I've been scratching my head over cause and effect..
true, it's an exhaust component, and we all know the temp that can occur at the DPF.. but I have to wonder how much heat actually makes it up to the sensor (approx 3 feet from the DPF) as it's deadhead and theres no flow through the sensor to carry that kind of heat.. next, under normal operation how much pressure would there be in a line like that.. certainly if the DPF was plugged, the upstream line would have a fair bit of pressure and the downstream non.. so at the end of the day, are clamps at the sensor really important or not with a good tight fit of a hose..
going back to my earlier post, I'm still trying to ascertain why MB would actually have the same ID hose for two different size spigots on the sensor.. no doubt the new hose is pliable but as I said earlier, I'm reluctant to try and squeeze that small hose over the large spigot..
Bernie
I've been scratching my head over cause and effect..
true, it's an exhaust component, and we all know the temp that can occur at the DPF.. but I have to wonder how much heat actually makes it up to the sensor (approx 3 feet from the DPF) as it's deadhead and theres no flow through the sensor to carry that kind of heat.. next, under normal operation how much pressure would there be in a line like that.. certainly if the DPF was plugged, the upstream line would have a fair bit of pressure and the downstream non.. so at the end of the day, are clamps at the sensor really important or not with a good tight fit of a hose..
going back to my earlier post, I'm still trying to ascertain why MB would actually have the same ID hose for two different size spigots on the sensor.. no doubt the new hose is pliable but as I said earlier, I'm reluctant to try and squeeze that small hose over the large spigot..
Bernie