My advice would be to take GaryJ's recommendation. I've never seen an electric fan that can come close to moving as much air as an engine-driven fan is able to. When it gets really hot, you really need (not just want) that engine-driven fan to move as much air as possible. You will see exclusively electric fans in front-wheel drive cars and in vehicles that have small engines and thus lower total heat generation, but for larger engines that can generate a lot of heat (because of burning a lot of fuel) you'll see engine-driven fans. For example, diesel-pusher motor homes with side radiators utilize hydraulic-driven fans, not electric.
I suspect you are trying to reduce mechanical power drainage on the engine by going to electric, thus to have more deliverable power to your drivetrain. However, to some degree this is a zero-sum game by the laws of thermodynamics. It will take a certain amount of energy to make a fan move a certain amount of air, and there's only so much electrical power you're going to be able to get from the alternator (which also imposes power drag on the engine to turn it) to drive an electric fan. When you cross that threshold, the engine driven fan becomes more efficient than the electric.
Thus, in a situation like our Sprinters, where it takes a lot of energy (and thus heat generation) to move a heavy vehicle, it will be more efficient to utilize the mechanical fan. The viscous clutch is used so the fan isn't taking power 100% of the time, and will be activated and take engine power only when needed. It's actually a good and proven system.
Rock Doc