L
Llarry
Guest
Seek: Just sent you an email. Let's try deleting me -- ooooh, I'll lose my prestigous low membership number -- and I'll sign up again.
looks like you got it covered !!Great news! (have to add that clapping emoticon one day)...
Seek
...and smilies count as pictures!sikwan said:Hi Richard:
You can post up to 10 photos per post. If there's more, then you have to start another post.
I agree, it irks me too. It takes much more effort to read a post.What exactly is the largest size picture that can be posted WITHOUT screwing up the entire thread? Although I love to see everyones photos, it bugs me when a pictures' size makes it so you need to scroll left to right to read the text, and or see who wrote the post. Perhaps it is on my end. this should be a forum setting, pic is too big, it does not display.
I changed a few things to hopefully help with the bandwidth for the long term. It's not like we have a lack of bandwidth now, so we can change it to the maximum if need be.Hi Guys
Thanks for the info! I think I have it right please advise ????
ten photos smileys per post no more limit at the uper-end of the scale.
OK, but if I go to another thread the 10 photos become available again untill I reach the max file size on that thread?
IS this right? or am I getting it wrong, sorry if I am ! but heck, we live down under, so the blood is thin when you walk around in the air all day
I think having images on another server is a great idea except for the technical section. Pictures that reside on servers for sections labeled Accessories, OEM Info, Issues, and Solutions would be useless when the link becomes dead or the server no longer exist. I can go through a number of threads, click their links, and go to a page that doesn't exist.The clickable thumbprint photo below is image shack
this saves the server bandwidth and you can place as many as you wish on the same thread, as persay this thread.
There is a method of wraping url tags around the photo for it to appear in a compleate 640 by 480! But I can't work it out.
In this thread...On your question concerning limiting picture dimensions: my vote is to not add a dimensions limit.